Ramblings

ULTRACOMFY's personal homepage.

User Tools

Site Tools


chat_control_level_2

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
chat_control_level_2 [2025/12/05 08:09] ultracomfychat_control_level_2 [2025/12/05 08:35] (current) ultracomfy
Line 10: Line 10:
 So if I say that child online safety is exclusively a parenting problem, and I also say that parenting is more than just parents, then I do implicitly say that we need more than just parents - both in general, and in terms of child online safety. So if you really wanted to push it, it could technically be said that I would see chat control as a viable solution to child online safety. And while I agree that it would be a "solution", I think it is a horrible and bad solution that should never be implemented. So if I say that child online safety is exclusively a parenting problem, and I also say that parenting is more than just parents, then I do implicitly say that we need more than just parents - both in general, and in terms of child online safety. So if you really wanted to push it, it could technically be said that I would see chat control as a viable solution to child online safety. And while I agree that it would be a "solution", I think it is a horrible and bad solution that should never be implemented.
  
-So, what //should// we do? Well, it depends on our preconceptions. In Level 1 I like to point out "western society" and "individualization" so much, and directly ask you whether you agree with this kind of society, because I think that communization of a lot of day to day life could potentially be a better alternative to the hyper-individualization we see today. Communes are stronger, more reliable and more resilient to hostile influences, and decentralization of child rearing means that no one person gets too much power over a defenseless child.+So, what //should// we do? Well, it depends on our preconceptions. In Level 1 I like to point out "western society" and "individualization" so much, and directly ask you whether you agree with this kind of society, because I think that communization of a lot of day to day life could potentially be a better alternative to the hyper-individualization we see today. Communes are stronger, more reliable and more resilient to hostile influences, and decentralization of child rearing means that no one person ever gets too much power over a defenseless child.
  
 When I say "parents are responsible for their children's online activity", I say that exclusively from a norm-observing standpoint, regardless of whether I personally agree with it. I think that my statement "parents are responsible for their children's online activity" is //correct//, if you say this from the standpoint of someone who wants to work with what they have. Of course, deep down I think that this shouldn't actually be, and that I believe there to be better methods. But //within our current system//, parents are the solution. When I say "parents are responsible for their children's online activity", I say that exclusively from a norm-observing standpoint, regardless of whether I personally agree with it. I think that my statement "parents are responsible for their children's online activity" is //correct//, if you say this from the standpoint of someone who wants to work with what they have. Of course, deep down I think that this shouldn't actually be, and that I believe there to be better methods. But //within our current system//, parents are the solution.
chat_control_level_2.1764922195.txt.gz · Last modified: by ultracomfy

Donate Powered by PHP Valid HTML5 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki