Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- conflict_resolution:start [2026/03/02 23:16] – ultracomfy
+++ conflict_resolution:start [2026/06/09 12:57] (current) – ultracomfy
@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 I will also mention that there are some acts which are so egregiously and obviously malicious that some, most or even all steps are skipped. Standard Conflict Resolution is closely tied to [[:ULTRACOMFY Ethical Jurisdiction System|Ethical Jurisdiction]] and often goes hand in hand. In these cases, pro-active defense is necessitated by the offender and we cannot wait until the system is run through conventionally.
-> [[Notice]]
->
-> [[Warning]]
->
-> [[Repeated Warning]]
->
-> [[Final]]
->
-> [[Consequences]]
-===== Emergencies =====
+# 1. [[Notice]]
-To mitigate the risk of conflict and escalation during a conversation, my then-best friend and I developed a flag system with the goal of enabling quick emotions communication and enabling swift and mutually understood action to prevent escalation.
+# 2. [[Warning]]
-{{:forfeit_green.png?nolink&20}} [[Green Flag]]
+# 3. [[Repeated Warning]]
-{{:forfeit_yellow.png?nolink&20}} [[Yellow Flag]]
+# 4. [[Final]]
-{{:forfeit.png?nolink&20}} [[Red Flag]]
+# 5. [[Consequences]]
-{{:forfeit.png?nolink&20}} [[Emotions Check]]
+<WRAP center round alert 60%>
+In case of a full diplomatic failure, your only method recourse may be initiating a conversation through requesting your Identifier or Extended Profile. See [[:people:start|People]] for more information.
+The goal of this system of conflict resolution is to //avoid// drama with people. While I might resolve to issuing S5-Consequences, the basic.* permission //always// persists to give individuals a method to get things sorted out if they want something to get sorted out, //even// in a Full Diplomatic Failure.
+</WRAP>
+See also: [[Emergencies|Emergencies]]