Ramblings

ULTRACOMFY's personal homepage.

User Tools

Site Tools


probably_wrong

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
probably_wrong [2025/08/23 15:06] ultracomfyprobably_wrong [2025/08/23 15:07] (current) ultracomfy
Line 52: Line 52:
 The possibility of being wrong is why freedom of speech and freedom of thought exist. We like to think that we are smart because we don't burn witches anymore. Back in the days, trying to argue that burning witches might actually be bad would have been //outrageous// and would have seen you burned along with them. They weren't even capable of fathoming a world without burning witches. Fast forward to today, we can fathom a world without burning witches, but there are still things us today can't fathom to live without. Those things are, by their very nature, very contentious. Some would say, for example, that a world without capitalism is impossible. Some say that a democracy is the only way we can live, but maybe in 500 years a technocratic society will laugh at our naivety. Maybe the [[veganism|vegans]] were right and killing animals just because they "taste well" is wrong after all((Honestly, I find this one pretty convincing. I hope I won't forget to think more and eventually write about this.)). Or here is one that even I cannot see past: Murder is bad - I think that, but who am I to say whether it really is? The possibility of being wrong is why freedom of speech and freedom of thought exist. We like to think that we are smart because we don't burn witches anymore. Back in the days, trying to argue that burning witches might actually be bad would have been //outrageous// and would have seen you burned along with them. They weren't even capable of fathoming a world without burning witches. Fast forward to today, we can fathom a world without burning witches, but there are still things us today can't fathom to live without. Those things are, by their very nature, very contentious. Some would say, for example, that a world without capitalism is impossible. Some say that a democracy is the only way we can live, but maybe in 500 years a technocratic society will laugh at our naivety. Maybe the [[veganism|vegans]] were right and killing animals just because they "taste well" is wrong after all((Honestly, I find this one pretty convincing. I hope I won't forget to think more and eventually write about this.)). Or here is one that even I cannot see past: Murder is bad - I think that, but who am I to say whether it really is?
  
-Either way, it is important for our society to at least //allow// even the fringest and most outrageous opinions. Injecting ourselves into that process and dictating which opinions are acceptable - no matter how good our reasoning - commits the same mistake that has stopped/slowed societal progress for all of human history. Not to mention the political implications of letting the government police which thoughts and opinions we get to have. +Either way, it is important for our society to at least //allow// even the fringest and most outrageous opinions. Injecting ourselves into that process and dictating which opinions are acceptable - no matter how good our reasoning - commits the same mistake that has stopped/slowed societal progress for all of human history. Not to mention the political implications of letting the government police which opinions we get to have. This all applies to thoughts as well - you should be able to reign freely in your head, no matter how abhorrent someone else would find those thoughts.
probably_wrong.txt · Last modified: 2025/08/23 15:07 by ultracomfy

Donate Powered by PHP Valid HTML5 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki