Ramblings

ULTRACOMFY's personal homepage.

User Tools

Site Tools


ramblings:accuracy

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
ramblings:accuracy [2025/09/02 23:58] ultracomfyramblings:accuracy [2025/09/03 00:00] (current) ultracomfy
Line 13: Line 13:
 Some people like to harp on "accuracy" because they stand to gain from someone being exceedingly specific. Companies might call it a "new, revised recipe", but I will continue to call it a "bad marketing scheme". "But you're missing out on the details! We changed so many things!" Yes, you changed exactly as much as you had to to be able to write "new, revised recipe" on it without getting fined. [[:Jehovah's witnesses]] may call it "respecting the secular authorities like the bible told them to", I will continue to call it "rejecting the secular authorities". That's not what it is? That's quite exactly what it is. The point is that people always seem to think that their specific ways are **so very much different** from everything else. They will always add their special flavor to well-established things without making any fundamental changes, but then drag conversations into the mud about these irrelevant details because <wrap em>they're important!</wrap> Look, just because your Schnitzel has a lemon on top of it doesn't make it any less of a Schnitzel.((I will admit, there WILL eventually be a point where talking about this Schnitzel with a lemon on top as "just a Schnitzel" will run into problems, but at that point I will always make the necessary concessions.)) Some people like to harp on "accuracy" because they stand to gain from someone being exceedingly specific. Companies might call it a "new, revised recipe", but I will continue to call it a "bad marketing scheme". "But you're missing out on the details! We changed so many things!" Yes, you changed exactly as much as you had to to be able to write "new, revised recipe" on it without getting fined. [[:Jehovah's witnesses]] may call it "respecting the secular authorities like the bible told them to", I will continue to call it "rejecting the secular authorities". That's not what it is? That's quite exactly what it is. The point is that people always seem to think that their specific ways are **so very much different** from everything else. They will always add their special flavor to well-established things without making any fundamental changes, but then drag conversations into the mud about these irrelevant details because <wrap em>they're important!</wrap> Look, just because your Schnitzel has a lemon on top of it doesn't make it any less of a Schnitzel.((I will admit, there WILL eventually be a point where talking about this Schnitzel with a lemon on top as "just a Schnitzel" will run into problems, but at that point I will always make the necessary concessions.))
  
-====== Not relevant to the point ======+====== Numbers ======
 Sometimes I will like to use numbers to illustrate an idea. These numbers are usually an estimation which I use solely to illustrate a concept - as I said in the beginning - to get across dynamics or mechanics. The exact number isn't typically relevant as long as it is //reasonably// within the ballpark. The width of what I mean with "reasonable" here depends on where the difference in number genuinely makes a difference. Sometimes I will like to use numbers to illustrate an idea. These numbers are usually an estimation which I use solely to illustrate a concept - as I said in the beginning - to get across dynamics or mechanics. The exact number isn't typically relevant as long as it is //reasonably// within the ballpark. The width of what I mean with "reasonable" here depends on where the difference in number genuinely makes a difference.
  
ramblings/accuracy.txt · Last modified: 2025/09/03 00:00 by ultracomfy

Donate Powered by PHP Valid HTML5 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki