Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- slashed_zero [2025/09/05 11:21] – ultracomfy
+++ slashed_zero [2026/02/23 10:24] (current) – ultracomfy
@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+~~NOTOC~~
 <WRAP column 18% right>
 {{page>Templates:Secularization}}
@@ Line 6: / Line 7: @@
 <WRAP centeralign>Writing/Legibility/\\
 <fs xx-large>Slashed Zero</fs></WRAP>\\
+<WRAP centeralign box>This page is a love letter to the slashed zero. Do not take it too serious.\\
+<wrap lo>No! Fucking take it serious! That text above me, the one that isn't forced to live in a corner with the subtlety effect applied like me, should be told to fuck off! This shit matters and I will die on that hill!</wrap></WRAP>
 ====== Rule 1 ======
-When designing letters for an alphabet, or numbers for a numbering system, it is important to make sure that individual characters are clearly distinguishable, even under adverse conditions. It should be easy to tell letters apart even in poor lighting condition, from an angle, when the character is moving, if parts of the character are cut off/not visible (Though of course there are limits to this), viewed from a distance and, ultimately, quickly. The goal of good letter and number design is to avoid a situation in which a reader needs to double check that they got a character right, even if they only caught a glimpse of it. Rule 1: Individual letters and individual numbers should be very clearly distinguishable. Characters should have clear, defining features that set them apart from other characters.\\
+When designing letters for an alphabet, or numbers for a numbering system, it is important to make sure that individual characters are clearly distinguishable, even under adverse conditions. It should be easy to tell letters apart even in poor lighting conditions, from an angle, when the character is moving, if parts of the character are cut off/not visible (within reason), viewed from a distance and, of course, quickly. The goal of good letter and number design is to avoid a situation in which a reader needs to double check that they got a character right, even if they only caught a glimpse of it. Rule 1: Individual letters and individual numbers should be very clearly distinguishable. Characters should have clear, defining features that set them apart from other characters.\\
 \\
 Example: a, e, o.\\
@@ Line 15: / Line 18: @@
 Now, everywhere around us there are [[strings]] in which both characters from the alphabet and numbers can appear. This text is one such string. License plates are such strings. Any one of the plastic cards in your wallet will have multiple such strings, especially your bank card. Any email will contain such strings. Passwords. In fact, most strings you see throughout the day can probably contain both letters and numbers next to each other. This means that the number zero and the letter o can appear //in the same string//. The problem between an uppercase O and the number zero is that they have //no distinguishing feature//. Yes, the O is usually wider than the zero, but that's only usually and depends on the font or the style of someone's writing. Without a distinguishing feature, you as the reader have to hope that the writer is consistent with their styling of zeroes and O's. Without a distinguishing feature, you as the reader will have to go back and cross-reference any O-shaped characters and verify that they indeed are what the context implies they are.\\
 \\
-And sure, it's //possible// to work it out. It's //possible// to find another character to cross-reference, to estimate character widths, to work it out based on context, but let me tell you what: Recognizing characters should not be a fucking riddle. A reader should never be forced to compare an unknown character in the text against one they already know; at this point your lettering system has failed. And even then, a reference character might be far away, making it hard to compare. Or a reference character might not exist at all, forcing you to guess based on your intuition of the width of the character you're looking at. Every character should be individually recognizable without context, without needing to cross-reference it.
+And sure, it's //possible// to work it out. It's //possible// to find another character to cross-reference, to estimate character widths, to work it out based on context, but here's the problem: Recognizing characters should not be a riddle. A reader should //never// be forced to compare an unknown character in the text against one they already know - **especially** under non-adverse conditions (ie. good lighting, not cut off, good visibility). If you can see the characters clearly and //still// need to compare them to make them out, your lettering system has **failed**. And even then, a reference character might be far away, making it hard to compare. Or a reference character might not exist at all, forcing you to guess based on your intuition of the width of the character you're looking at. Every character should be, nay, //needs to be// individually recognizable without context, without needing to cross-reference it.
 ====== The Solution ======
-Slash that zero. O and o is fine, but O and zero are not fine. Give one of them a distinguishing feature, and since was born: The slashed zero - 0.\\
+Slash that zero. O and o are on the edge of acceptable, but O and zero are //not// acceptable. Give one of them a distinguishing feature, and since was born: The slashed zero - 0.\\
-A beaute. I //love// slashed zero. It's sleek, it's rare, it's kinda special, and it's extremely satisfying to write. Normal zero and then //SLAAAASHHH//. Makes me feel like I'm right back in the 2000's.\\
+A beaute. I //love// slashed zero. It's sleek, it's rare, it's kinda special, and it's extremely satisfying to write. A slashed zero is like hitting the enter key after writing a sentence. //Slash// - it feels like the satisfying conclusing to a thrilling story, it makes me feel like I'm right back in the 2000's.\\
-Slashed zeroes are just plain //cool//, alright. They express personality, but they're cool as fuck about it because ultimately it is done for a very practical purpose: Increase legibility.
+Slashed zeroes are just plain //cool//, alright. They express personality, but they're pragmatic about it because, ultimately, it is done for a very practical purpose: Legibility.
-Interestingly, I see a lot of resistance against slashed zero, the primary argument being the Scandinavian Ø. Now, first of all, the Ø has the distinguishing feature that the slash extends beyond the O, but hey, it could be argued that in handwriting this may get unclear. Yeah, I actually agree on that and think that, overall, this is a valid argument. For Scandinavians, this could genuinely be a problem. For anyone else, though, this is not a problem at all. Most people are not Scandinavian and I have never, not once in my life, seen a Ø except in a discussion about slashed zeroes. Much less have I ever used one. The mathematical diameter sign may get close, but it is even more distinguishable and still very rare. The reality is that any string in our lives will have a 0 and an O, not a 0 and a (Ø or ⌀). So while I agree that the slashed zero may not be a //perfect// solution, I am sure it is a very good one.
+Interestingly, I see a lot of resistance against slashed zero, the primary argument being the Scandinavian Ø. Now, first of all, the Ø has the distinguishing feature that the slash extends beyond the O, but hey, it could be argued that in handwriting this may get unclear. Yeah, I actually agree on that and think that, overall, this is a valid argument. For Scandinavians, this could genuinely be a problem. For anyone else, though, this is not a problem at all. Most people are not Scandinavian and I have never, not once in my life, seen a Ø **except in a discussion about slashed zeroes**. Much less have I ever used one. The mathematical diameter sign may get close, but it is even more distinguishable and still very rare. The reality is that any string in our lives will have a 0 and an O, not a 0 and a {Ø or ⌀}. So while I agree that the slashed zero may not be a //perfect// solution, I am sure it is a very good one.
-Therefore, since a few years I've been working to change fonts I like to have slashed zeroes. The font on this website, for example, did not come with a slashed zero, so I edited it and gave the zero a slash. I have done that with other fonts before as well. I am very proud of my 0, and any other fonts I will use extensively in the future will be edited to contain slashed zeroes as well. Muah, my beloved.
+Therefore, since a few years I've been working to change fonts I like to have slashed zeroes. The font on this website, ScienceGothic Thin, did not come with a slashed zero, so I edited it and gave the zero a slash. I have done that with many other fonts before as well. I am very proud of my 0, and any other fonts I will use extensively in the future will be edited to contain slashed zeroes as well. Muah, my beloved.