Ramblings

ULTRACOMFY's personal homepage.

User Tools

Site Tools


toleration

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
toleration [2025/04/09 20:28] ultracomfytoleration [2025/08/14 10:25] (current) ultracomfy
Line 1: Line 1:
 +~~NOTOC~~
 ~~Title:Toleration~~ ~~Title:Toleration~~
 <WRAP column right 18%> <WRAP column right 18%>
 {{page>Templates:Philosophy}} {{page>Templates:Philosophy}}
 </WRAP>  </WRAP> 
- +<WRAP centeralign>Philosophy/\\ 
-<fs xx-large>Toleration</fs> is the absence of objection to behaviors, attitudes or similar things where others unrightfully believe that they justify objection. This, I believe, is a reasonable definition when one puts the word "Tolerance" at the beginning of the sentence; however, I think that tolerance is much better categorized and contextualized from a more fundamentally philosophical perspective:+<fs xx-large>Toleration</fs></WRAP>\\ 
 +Toleration is the absence of objection to behaviors, attitudes or similar things where others unrightfully believe that they justify objection. This, I believe, is a reasonable definition when one puts the word "Tolerance" at the beginning of the sentence; however, I think that tolerance is much better categorized and contextualized from a more fundamentally philosophical perspective:
  
 Decisions, acts, beliefs and so on and so forth are [[utilitarianism|moral or immoral based on how they affect you and the people around you]]. Some beliefs would cause harm, others not so much. Now, in a perfect world we would all agree on what beliefs cause harm, at which point the creation of the words "tolerance" and "intolerance" would never be prompted. The word "intolerance" emerges only when disagreement over the effect of a belief or act exists. Commonly, the word "intolerance" is used to describe such things that unnecessarily, ie. immorally, hurt individuals or groups of individuals. Not all hurt is "bad", but that which is bad **is** intolerant **if** the motivation for that hurt is based on [[prejudice]]. Theft isn't necessarily "intolerant" if it is motivated by personal gain only, but if it is motivated in part by prejudice then at least the motivation for the act is considered "intolerant". From this, tolerance emerges as the word that simply means the opposite, being accepting of things that others are not accepting of. Decisions, acts, beliefs and so on and so forth are [[utilitarianism|moral or immoral based on how they affect you and the people around you]]. Some beliefs would cause harm, others not so much. Now, in a perfect world we would all agree on what beliefs cause harm, at which point the creation of the words "tolerance" and "intolerance" would never be prompted. The word "intolerance" emerges only when disagreement over the effect of a belief or act exists. Commonly, the word "intolerance" is used to describe such things that unnecessarily, ie. immorally, hurt individuals or groups of individuals. Not all hurt is "bad", but that which is bad **is** intolerant **if** the motivation for that hurt is based on [[prejudice]]. Theft isn't necessarily "intolerant" if it is motivated by personal gain only, but if it is motivated in part by prejudice then at least the motivation for the act is considered "intolerant". From this, tolerance emerges as the word that simply means the opposite, being accepting of things that others are not accepting of.
toleration.1744223319.txt.gz · Last modified: 2025/04/09 20:28 by ultracomfy

Donate Powered by PHP Valid HTML5 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki