Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- jehovah_s_witnesses [2026/03/03 12:29] – ultracomfy
+++ jehovah_s_witnesses [2026/03/03 12:37] (current) – ultracomfy
@@ Line 104: / Line 104: @@
 And even that is done in an intentionally ambiguous way. They may not explicitly reject scientific conclusions, at least outwardly, but on the inside you will find Watchtower sanctioned videos showing exciting, unlikely animal features (like the soundless owl feathers) and leadingly ask "This couldn't possibly have come about by random chance, right?". Verbatim. And no, this didn't happen randomly, this happened because there were evolutionary pressures on the animal that made the animal's evolution drift into that direction((...randomly. It's not wrong, but come on.. it's not really random either.)).
-One favorite you're gonna make witnesses very uncomfortable with is the shape of the earth, because all of them would //like// to believe that it's a disk. The bible doesn't explicitly state it, but it very much implies it and that means it keeps them up at night, especially because many of them aren't scientifically illiterate enough to actually believe it. The same extends all the way to the Watchtower, which needs to decide on whether to double down and make disk earth official doctrine, to give it to a spherical earth or, and that's ultimately what they did, kind of avoid the topic and be very subtle about it. Outwardly, again, Watchtower panders towards the sane option and says on their website that "the Bible does not teach that the earth is flat". All implications in the bible pointing towards a flat earth are excused as "figures of speech" (That's the no. #1 tactic of a biblically literalist cult to avoid dealing with problematic sentences in their own scripture.((Followed closely by no. #2: censoring the problematic sentence by just making your own scripture "based on" the original.))). Internally, again, the shape of the earth is very much a matter for discussion. Who knows.... <shrug> what the shape of the earth really is, right?
+One favorite you're gonna make witnesses very uncomfortable with is the shape of the earth, because all of them would //like// to believe that it's a disk. The bible doesn't explicitly state it, but it very much implies it and that means it keeps them up at night, especially because many of them aren't scientifically illiterate enough to actually believe it. The same extends all the way to the Watchtower, which needs to decide on whether to double down and make disk earth official doctrine, to give it to a spherical earth or, and that's ultimately what they did, kind of avoid the topic and be very subtle about it. Outwardly, again, Watchtower panders towards the sane option and says on their website that "the Bible does not teach that the earth is flat". All implications in the bible pointing towards a flat earth are excused as "figures of speech" (That's the no. #1 tactic of a biblically literalist cult to avoid dealing with problematic sentences in their own scripture.((Followed closely by no. #2: censoring the problematic sentence by just making your own scripture "based on" the original.))). Internally, again, the shape of the earth is very much a matter for discussion. Who knows.... <shrug> what the shape of the earth really is, right? Oh, did I forget to mention that Jehovah's Witnesses used to fully believe flat earth, and that the tolerance towards a spherical earth is actually comparatively new? As I said, they really want to believe in flat earth, but as a modern cult you can't bring that if you also want a lot of adherents.